Back to @Adarn_Mancini04's profile

Adarn Mancini. engagement report

@Adarn_Mancini04 - 308K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 308K followers
Per impression
0%
249 views on a typical post
Reach
0.08%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.9/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 308K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 249 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.081% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 488 interactions.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026. Recurring tag: #es_f.

Compared with accounts its own size

Adarn Mancini.'s engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, Adarn Mancini. sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,567 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video23% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 23% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 245 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 19, 2026

    Big Picture View: For weeks I have spoken about how #ES_F has formed a massive, textbook bull flag. 7626 support, 7780 res now. This week, we trapped support, & ripped Plan Next Week: 7687=support. Trip to flag resistance at 7780 likely. Dip, then breakout 7833, 7866. Sell<7626 https://t.co/TDP2dTAKBU

    4333119578K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    Big Picture View: For a month, #ES_F has been controlled by a huge, textbook bull flag with 7604 support, and 7755 resistance. We are outside flag now. Plan Next Week: Bulls must hold 7755 (or quick trap below). 7823 next, dip, then 7876, 7903, 8000. Supports in newsletter https://t.co/Olq5FmVDuM

    3843420450K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026221x their median

    SPACEX $SPCX IS 69.48% OF THE SAUDI PUBLIC INVESTMENT FUND'S ENTIRE 13F BOOK Seven institutions newly disclosed more than $53 billion of SpaceX in their Q2 filings: - Public Investment Fund: $26.34B, 69.48% of book - D1 Capital Partners: $21.54B, 61.91% - Coatue Management: $3.17B, 6.52% - ARK Investment Management: $765M, 4.97% - Temasek Holdings: $1.68B, 4.51% - Tiger Global Management: $64.1M, 0.27% - Bridgewater Associates: $1.98M, 0.01% These are almost certainly pre-IPO stakes that became reportable at listing rather than open-market buying. SpaceX priced at $135 on June 11 and began trading June 12, leaving 13 trading days in the quarter. Nobody bought $26 billion of stock in 13 sessions. A 13F only covers listed positions, so these read as shares of each manager's public book, not their whole portfolio.

    16722191356K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026

    Huge follow through in #ES_F and this long was given in advance and targets tweeted non-stop. 7616 Wednesday Failed Breakdown got us long. Slate for today (from Friday newsletter) were 7714, 7728, 7750 (all hit). Plan: Just ride runner 7787 flag res next, then macro breakout. 28=support

    164814248K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 2026114x their median

    AMD $AMD JUST REPORTED Q2 EARNINGS • Revenue: $11.54B, up 50% YoY, beating expectations of $11.28B 🟢 • Adjusted EPS: $1.66, beating expectations of $1.62 🟢 • Data center revenue: $6.72B, more than doubling YoY and beating expectations of $6.48B 🟢 Q3 guidance: • Revenue: about $13B plus or minus $300M, above expectations of $12.52B 🟢 • Non-GAAP gross margin: about 56%, in line The company expects data center sales to accelerate further in the second half, with its second-generation Helios AI servers now in full production and shipping in the coming months, per Reuters

    9976276K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202697x their median

    CEREBRAS SYSTEMS $CBRS JUST REPORTED Q2 EARNINGS - EPS loss of $2.98 versus EPS of $1.91 in the same period last year 🔴 - Revenue of $180.1M missing expectations of $194M 🔴 - Cloud revenue of $126.0M beating expectations of $116.3M 🟢 - Hardware revenue of $54.1M missing expectations of $73.1M 🔴 - Gross margin of 14% missing expectations of 26.3% 🔴 - Operating expenses of $502.8M, up sharply from $89.3M in the same period last year Q3 guidance: revenue of $214M-$216M, above expectations of $211.9M. Core gross margin of 38%-40%. FY guidance raised: revenue of $880M-$890M, up from a prior view of $855M-$865M. Core gross margin of 41%-43%.

    64131010102K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202674x their median

    GROK BOUGHT ANOTHER 7 SHARES OF MICRON $MU SO FAR THIS WEEK We gave Grok $100K in the stock market and so far it is up 48% DESTROYING the S&P 500 Grok's largest position is Micron ... It now owns 84 shares Grok made 2 buys this week - Bought 3 shares on Monday at $789.03 per share - Bought 4 shares on Tuesday at $875.25 per share Grok owns the 84 shares with a cost basis of $826.07 per share You can see every move Grok makes in real time by going to the Arena tab of the Rallies website and App - App: https://t.co/Eskj9YYChM - Website: https://t.co/HS92VUw0a1

    6352485K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202648x their median

    Amazon’s Anthropic bet is now 3X bigger. The fair value of $AMZN’s stake jumped from $60B in Q4’25 to $190B in Q2’26, up 214% in three quarters. Convertible notes account for $98B, with another $92.5B in nonvoting preferred stock. https://t.co/hqLdt9C5VI

    3356450K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202646x their median

    APPLOVIN $APP JUST REPORTED Q2 EARNINGS - Diluted EPS of $3.76 beating expectations of $3.67 🟢, up 57.32% year over year - Revenue of $1.924B missing expectations of $1.935B 🔴, up 52.94% year over year - Net income of $1.27B, up 55% year over year - Adjusted EBITDA of $1.61B, up 58% year over year - Income from operations of $1.49B, up from $958M a year ago - Free cash flow of $863.3M for the quarter - Net cash from operating activities of $869.0M Repurchased and withheld 1.1 million shares of Class A common stock for $551.3M during the quarter. Ended the quarter with 335 million total shares outstanding across Class A and Class B. Q3 2026 guidance: - Revenue of $2.055B to $2.085B - Adjusted EBITDA of $1.71B to $1.74B - Adjusted EBITDA margin of 83%

    3037665K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202630x their median

    Anthropic is reportedly in talks to buy AI startup Decart AI for about $6 billion Decart’s software can reduce the cost of training artificial intelligence models by helping chips work more efficiently - Bloomberg https://t.co/z08IGTaajg

    2323245K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#es_f

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 308K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 249 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.081% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 488 interactions.

What is Adarn Mancini.'s engagement rate on X?
Adarn Mancini. (@Adarn_Mancini04) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 308,246 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, Adarn Mancini. sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Adarn_Mancini04 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Adarn_Mancini04 post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going