Abhijit Chavda engagement report
@AbhijitChavda - 213K followers on X
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 562 interactions against 213K followers, an engagement rate of 0.264%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 54K times each, and 1.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 25.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.9K interactions, about 10x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #askabhijit, #allvassals, #brics.
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026. Recurring tags: #askabhijit, #allvassals, #brics.
Compared with accounts its own size
Abhijit Chavda's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.264%, Abhijit Chavda sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,805 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.697%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.697% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 58% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 42% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 58% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 42% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 129 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 26, 202610x their median
Why does Trump like Xi and Putin so much and despise our democratic allies so much? Thoughts? Theories?
- Mar 2, 20266.4x their median
Since this concept is now being plagiarized by all and sundry, a reminder of who created it. Fighting for survival without Chinese or Russian support, Iran is the newest addition to the list. https://t.co/78b2sZeXrm
- Oct 1, 20266.0x their median
This is a terrible translation, @Grok. https://t.co/wCtXNwD8ta
- Jul 29, 20264.8x their median
US Senator Sen Richard Blumenthal on bill that imposes yp to 100 % tariffs for importing energy from Russia. "We are hitting China, India, they are the main culprits. They are fueling Russia's war machine" "We are not hitting our allies" Vdo csty: Fox News https://t.co/kUk3AbeJfw
- Aug 26, 20264.7x their median
At the height of the Ice Age, the busy part of the world was in the Indian subcontinent and equatorial lands. Three great floods took much of it, now on the sea floor. At Poompuhar, on the coast of Tamil Nadu, an underwater survey has mapped an 11 by 3 kilometre area, twenty-five kilometres out to sea, that appears to hold a drowned harbour, dockyards, settlements and canals wide enough to move over seventy ships at once. Some of the material dates to a period when, in the version of history most people were taught, human beings had not yet invented cities. Archaeologists’ initial dates need further investigation but it appears to be a transformational discovery. The seas were then 120 metres lower than today. Two subcontinents that no longer exist, Sundaland off Southeast Asia and a second land reaching from Japan toward Taiwan, stood above the water. The warm coasts of the south were where fish were caught, cereals, fruits and nuts were collected, timber grew, and trade goods were gathered. When the ice melted, in three great surges, 25 million square kilometres of lived-on land went under, more than the size of Europe. Its people were sailors; Australia had been reached by boat sixty thousand years before. Sri Lanka was managing cereals 15,000 years ago. The oldest cotton thread on earth was spun in northwest India. The Sarasvati, five miles wide in places, fed a river system that by one estimate housed a tenth of every human being then alive, while the far north was still thawing. Almost every culture keeps a story of a great flood, and they cluster thickest in the drowned lands. In India it is Manu, warned in time, and a boat towed to safety by Vishnu in the form of a great fish. The story of the ancient world did not begin where we were taught. It began in the equatorial regions, on coasts now under the water, and the divers are only now starting to reach them. Link to my full Substack essay with sources in the image below.
- Oct 1, 20264.5x their median
Rate the restoration by our chest thumping sarkari organisation on a scale of 0-10. https://t.co/aJJBsCajo0
- Sep 19, 20263.4x their median
https://t.co/gBDfA6Enbc
- Apr 3, 20253.1x their median
لوتنيك 🇺🇸 : إنهم لا يسمحون لنا ببيع الذرة في الهند 🇮🇳 و اللحوم في أوروبا 🇪🇺 و أستراليا 🇦🇺. المذيعة 🎙️: هذا بسبب الهرمونات الكيميائية! لوتنك 🇺🇸: هذا هراء هم فقط يريدون حماية منتجاتهم، فهم يستخدمون بذور مطحونة ملخوطة بالحشرات. https://t.co/HRX1gNhU18
- Sep 30, 2026
Would Xerxes Have Understood Sanskrit? A few months ago, I was in Eastern Turkey, and on one of our last days we made our way to Van. https://t.co/8JkuxQehpP
- Sep 11, 2026
Time to think about the benefits of BRICS membership; India should Forget BRICS and go West - Europe and USA; https://t.co/BmRPgZawPh https://t.co/LPq0Xgz8pm
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 562 interactions against 213K followers, an engagement rate of 0.264%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 54K times each, and 1.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 25.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.9K interactions, about 10x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #askabhijit, #allvassals, #brics.
- What is Abhijit Chavda's engagement rate on X?
- Abhijit Chavda (@AbhijitChavda) has an engagement rate of 0.264%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 213,141 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.264%, Abhijit Chavda sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,805 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @AbhijitChavda have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @AbhijitChavda post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.