Aaron Siri engagement report
@AaronSiriSG - 294K followers on X
Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 738 interactions against 294K followers, an engagement rate of 0.252%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 5.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 56x its own typical post.
Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Aaron Siri's engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 88% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.252%, Aaron Siri sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.698%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 60% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 30% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 30% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 2673 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 31, 202656x their median
🚨 WOW! President Trump is RUSHING to the defense of the unvaccinated Amish, saying in 330 years, not one published case has documented an unvaccinated Amish child with autism Democrats want to force them into getting vaccinated. LEAVE THE AMISH ALONE. - 1,899 Amish children screened - 7 ASD cases confirmed - Vaccine histories were collected - The abstract did NOT report any confirmed cases as completely unvaccinated Autism HAS been documented in Amish children, but there is an outright absence of a published case documenting BOTH autism and ZERO vaccinations, the graphic says Let them decide. MEDICAL FREEDOM 🇺🇸
- Dec 21, 202242x their median
Mandates are the tool of bullies, criminals and dictators. If a patient refuses a medical product after being conveyed its benefits and risks, then that is called informed consent. They were informed and did not consent. Mandating over this objection is immoral and illiberal.
- Oct 13, 202614x their median
Discussing why the claim “vaccines do not cause autism” is a tenet of faith, not a statement of fact. https://t.co/XePkVvaB0h
- Oct 6, 20268.4x their median
What didn’t cause the over 98% decline in measles deaths between 1900 and the early 1960s? The measles vaccine—because it didn’t exist yet. https://t.co/IXVA5cCQAY
- Sep 23, 20266.6x their median
On the topic of splitting up the MMR vaccine into 3 separate vaccines, everyone should know that in 2012, two Merck virologists came forward and explained that around 2005 when Merck sought to change the label on its MMR vaccine and approval for ProQuad (a combination MMR and varicella vaccine), it “falsely certified as having an efficacy rate that is significantly higher than it actually is.” (Complaint ¶ 1.) As detailed in the whistleblower lawsuit, Merck obtained a license for its mumps vaccine in 1967. (Comp. ¶ 16.) In the late 1990s, to obtain approval for ProQuad and change the label on its MMR vaccine, Merck needed to reconfirm its claims of efficacy for its mumps vaccine made thirty years prior. (Comp.. ¶ 22.) Merck’s virologists working on testing the efficacy of the mumps vaccine revealed that after Merck could not demonstrate a 95% efficacy for its mumps vaccine, the results were simply fraudulently falsified to achieve this result. (Comp. ¶¶ 15-131.) As explained by Merck’s virologists, Merck took blood samples pre-vaccinated with the mumps vaccine and then exposed them to the mumps virus. (Comp. ¶¶ 25-28.) When a test against a live strain of mumps would not yield a 95% efficacy, Merck tried to improperly obtain this rate using an attenuated strain of the mumps virus. (Comp. ¶¶ 29-30.) When this still would not achieve 95% efficacy, Merck tried different virus dilutions, different straining procedure, and even more liberal antibody counting techniques. (Comp. ¶¶ 31-32.) The Merck lab even improperly added animal antibodies to the blood samples and still could not achieve a 95% efficacy rate. (Comp. ¶¶ 33-39.) When it was clear that even improper testing techniques could not produce the desired result, the test reports were simply falsified. (Comp. ¶¶ 40-51.) According to the Merck virologists, to document the desired efficacy rate, Merck destroyed result sheets and falsified various documents. (Id.) The Merck virologists claim this fraud was done with the direct authority and approval of Merck’s senior management. (Comp. ¶¶ 52-58.) Now you know. This may explain why outbreaks of mumps still regularly occur in highly vaccinated populations. See, e.g.: https://t.co/YgTukQi0eg(317 cases; 89% had received at least 2 MMR doses); https://t.co/i7vsAVGixp(281 cases; high two-dose coverage among university-affiliated cases, with community spread); https://t.co/dKYuleKBM2(301 student cases; all patients with complications had received at least 2 doses); https://t.co/b4YB8ePKPG(42 cases; all patients had ≥2 documented MMR doses; campus two-dose coverage exceeded 99%); https://t.co/PtJBYPwsKt(29 cases; 76% had received the recommended 2 dose); https://t.co/W0IqwV4pZd(CDC: “experts aren’t sure why vaccinated people still get mumps…). Complaint: https://t.co/hbnjc7YNfa
- Sep 29, 20264.9x their median
“This is not a staffing shortage we face. It is a systemic removal of conscience from the patient's last line of defense between life and the most profitable industry in the United States. The nurse is present at the beginning of life, the end of life, and the scary moments in between. Our loyalty must never belong to the institution. Our loyalty must always belong to our patients.” — Gail Macrae, RN, BSN
- Sep 2, 20264.4x their median
If the government can coerce an injection that violates your religious freedom, then what can’t they do?! https://t.co/j6XHU1FJnp
- Oct 15, 20263.3x their median
Let’s just quickly dispel the notion that children have gotten healthier as we have increased the number of vaccines they are given. https://t.co/IHfoR0c1wQ
- Sep 6, 20263.0x their median
Were you or your family member affected by mandated Covid hospital protocols? @SenRonJohnson's office wants to hear from you. This includes: -Families who lost loved ones under hospital protocols - Patients or families whose requests for alternative or Right to Try treatments were denied - Physicians, nurses, and other healthcare professionals who were prevented from exercising their medical judgment - Healthcare workers who witnessed harmful protocols, coercion, or the denial of requested treatment Submit your story here no later than Monday, September 7th: https://t.co/QzvSJFyJC3
- Aug 11, 20262.6x their median
The President of the American Academy of Pediatrics tells @ErinBurnett Trump is “misinformed” for saying it can be “explosive” to combine childhood vaccines. https://t.co/Ap7rG81lhw
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 738 interactions against 294K followers, an engagement rate of 0.252%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 5.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 56x its own typical post.
- What is Aaron Siri's engagement rate on X?
- Aaron Siri (@AaronSiriSG) has an engagement rate of 0.252%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 293,631 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.252%, Aaron Siri sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @AaronSiriSG have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @AaronSiriSG post?
- Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.